“Response To The LGBTQIA Organizations, The Homosexual Agenda and those who adhere to it”
“Response To The LGBTQIA Organizations, The Homosexual Agenda, and Those who adhere to it”
This is being written in response to the organized LGBTQIA organizations and their supporters push to make Heterosexuals accept their Euro-Asiatic, sexually degenerate, sexually deviant, anti-life behavior as natural and normal behavior and who want to silence us from taking a stand against their madness. Here is what those in the organized LGBTQIA movement, those who practice Homosexuality and those who support them need to grasp. This is what we, who are sane and straight know and understand. We fully understand that as Afrikan people, be we from the Diaspora or from the continent itself, must understand: We are at WAR!!! This WAR is physical, spiritual, cultural, and mental. We are at War for the Minds, Bodies, and Souls of Black people everywhere. Our enemies (Caucasians, Arabs, and others) DO NOT fear our men–Black men, who participate in such Euro-Asiatic, sexually degenerate, sexually deviant, anti-life behavior. Who would fear men who DO NOT want to be men, but would rather be women, if nature allowed it? Who would honor and respect women who would rather be men, if nature allowed it? Any person who participates in such behavior truly needs to reconsider doing so. Such behavior is extremely unhealthy and dangerous to one’s health, as you’ll see below. Our women and families are left unprotected and unloved because these sexually confused individuals would rather try being other than what the Divine essence of Creation created them to be: loving partners and protectors of our wives and families. This behavior is nothing more than sexual confusion–plain and simple. Our position must be based on Black Nationalist, and Afrikan-Centered ideology. It must be based upon our ancient indigenous Afrikan Ancestral, Spiritual, and Cultural Practices. These ancient indigenous Afrikan Ancestral, Ideological, Philosophical, Cultural practices are based on the concept of Ma’at (“Truth, Justice, Righteousness, Reciprocity, Harmony, and Order”). Anything else will only lead us collectively back to where we are right now—-Nowhere. If we allow those of our people who have adopted the debased, morally, culturally, sexually deviant, and sexually degenerate practices of our mortal enemies into our Movements, Organizations and finally, into any liberated Government we might establish, it will ultimately destroy us and that Movement, Organization, and/or Government and put us right back where we were—a broken and destroyed people once again.
What we all need to understand in this: Everything in creation has a purpose. When one understands the correct purpose of things within creation, one is not so apt to misuse them. This is how simple this is. The Vagina is perfectly designed and created to accept the penetration of a Penis. Both organs perfectly designed to help in our own Procreation. However, the Anus is designed and created for but one purpose and one purpose only, to expel fecal matter. That is its only purpose. And the rubbing of two Vagina clitoris’ together for the purpose of deriving some kind of pleasure, was not designed for the purpose either. And Homosexuality presents absolutely no good purpose to our children nor any good purpose for them either—none at all. This behavior offers absolutely nothing positive towards the upliftment of our people either. Our ancient indigenous Afrikan Ancestors figured this out thousands upon thousands of years ago.
There are some who falsely try to say you can find Homosexuality/Pederasty within the animal kingdom. We know this isn’t true unless those animals are kept in controlled environments. What one must consider, when making such an assertion is this: the 3 most important functions of all living species, which are:
(1) To live and protect itself
(2) To eat to sustain itself,
(3) Have sex (Procreate) to perpetuate itself.
How can any living species perpetuate itself when practicing Homosexuality?
Here is some simple logic that all humans on this planet can understand. All living organisms are created on this planet to recreate/reproduce themselves. In humans, this requires they be Heterosexuals of opposite gender to engage in sexual intercourse with one another. This is impossible and cannot occur in Human beings of the same gender, who practiced Homosexuality.
Another issue that the organized LGBTQIA community organizations advocates are the usage of a new term that was introduced into the English language as a weapon against those who oppose Homosexuality. That new term was the combining of the two terms Homo+Phobia. The combined terms of Homo+Phobia only entered into the English language after 1965. Before 1965, such a combined term had never existed in the English language. This combined term was first coined by Dr. George Weinberg, a Psychologist, who was an early proponent of removing Homosexuality from ‘The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders’ (DSM). The term first appeared in print in ‘The Screw’ on May 5, 1969. So, to address those who falsely accuse those of us who disagree with Homosexuality, with the accusation of being Homo+Phobic I am writing this to clear up the confusion, by presenting the correct definition of the term Homo+sexual and the correct clinical definition of the term Phobia. The use of the combined terms Homo+Phobia as a description for those who oppose Homosexuality, as well as the effort of trying to redefine its definition are false for this very important reason. There is no such combined, clinical term or definition for the combined terms, Homo+Phobia, included in ‘The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders’ (DSM). There is, however, the term Phobia, and that clinical, psychological term, and its definition are included within ‘The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders’ (DSM). First of all, we must be crystal clear, as to the correct and proper use of such a combined term. Homo+phobic are actually two terms, not one.
These two terms were combined together, by Dr. George Weinberg, a Psychologist at the urging of organized Homosexual groups to further the organized ‘Homosexual Agenda’. The two terms were combined to create the false term now used and referred to by Homosexuals as ‘Homo+phobia’. This term was created and combined to misguide, confuse, and/or intimidate Heterosexuals and anyone else who opposes Homosexuality into acceptance of Homosexuals and their Homosexual behavior as natural and normal behavior. However, there is nothing natural nor normal about such behavior. Homo is a prefix and means same. When used in conjunction with the term Sexual, a suffix, and represents a Homo+sexual. A Homosexual is anyone who has conjugal sex with someone of the same gender. The term phobic derives from the term Phobia, which is defined and included in ‘The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders’ (DSM). The term Phobia is defined as someone who is afraid of someone or something, or someone who has an irrational fear of someone or something. Based upon this correct definition of both combined terms (Homo+Phobic), I am not now, nor have I ever been afraid of Homosexuals, nor do I have an irrational fear of them. I know what they want. They want access to our children’s precious mind, bodies, and souls. If your definitions are incorrect, so too, will your analysis be incorrect, as well. This is the correct definition of the two terms, Homo+Phobia. And the correct use of these two terms is highly important to such a discussion. So, you can’t come to the correct conclusions if your analysis is based on incorrect and faulty definitions and information on anything. As such, if any persons or organized LGBTQIA groups, etc., posts articles or accuses any of us, who disagrees with Homosexuality, of being Homo+Phobic, the definition I’ve provided will defend our stance against their false and incorrect accusations. It is because of their hurling these false accusations against those of us, who oppose the acceptance of Homosexuality as natural or normal behavior, when it is anything but natural and normal, that it is proper that the correct definition is provided of the two combined terms to prove that we are not Homo+Phobic at all.
The organized Homosexual/LGBTQIA organizations also like to put forth as an argument in their defense, the fact that in 1973, Homosexuality was removed from the listings of Mental Disorders in ‘The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders’ (DSM). What no one can seem to explain, however, is why Homosexuality was removed from that list of Mental Disorders? Homosexuality was removed from the list of Mental Disorders by the efforts of the then President of the American Psychiatric Association, Dr. Al Freedman, and Dr. Robert Spitzer, along with the National Gay Task Force. It was simply removed thru a simple up and down vote by the Board of Directors of the American Psychiatric Association. Critics of this decision requested a referendum. When the referendum was held several months later, 58% percent of the membership voted to support the new policy. And so, Homosexuality was removed from the DSM simply on an ‘up and down’ vote.
What should be clear from that new policy is the fact that no one within the American Psychiatric Association has ever conducted, nor produced then or now, any scientific research study, nor provided any such scientific research study conducted and produced by any other University, or Scientific Research Institution, etc. which justifies Homosexuality being removed from the list of Mental Disorders, within in ‘The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders’ (DSM). It appears to simply have been a concerted and contrived effort by the then President of the American Psychiatric Association, Dr. Al Freedman, along with Dr. Robert Spitzer, and the National Gay Task Force to push for the acceptance of Homosexuality as normal and natural behavior, without any scientific evidence at all, to justify such a stance.
What the organized LGBTQIA organizations and their ardent supporters have actively been doing is pushing this behavior as being natural and normal thru the use of ‘Weaponized Subliminal Seduction’ and ‘Propaganda’, against us, without many of us even realizing it. They created what is referred to as ‘The Homosexual Agenda’ and have been actively pushing that organized Agenda on us without our realizing it. They organized this in a monumental way in 1972. And they have been using ‘Weaponized Subliminal Seduction’ and ‘Propaganda’, using Mass Media, in all areas of people activity. This is what they agreed to advocate. Now, the question is this: To people of the LGBTQIA community and those who either support the LGBTQIA community and organizations and or are Homosexuals themselves, have you heard of “The 1972 Gay Rights Platform” and have you read them? Do you agree with the demands contained within “The 1972 Gay Rights Platform”? And, if so, you need to fully commit to doing so. If you do not agree with them, are you going to take a stand against them fully, vociferously, in words and deeds? Here is a list of their demands:
“The 1972 Gay Rights Platform”
‘In February 1972 the National Coalition of Gay Organizations met at the Armitage Avenue United Methodist Church in Chicago. An invitation had been sent out to 495 homosexual organizations across the U.S. to come and prepare a “Gay stance for the 1972 elections.”
About 200 individuals from 18 states representing 85 organizations showed up for the two-day event. Conference participants adopted the 1972 Gay Rights Platform, which included 17 federal and state “demands.”
For over 40 years, this Platform has been the beacon of the homosexual movement in America. Back in 1972, their demands seemed so outlandish that nobody took them seriously. But gay activists have been extremely focused and relentless in achieving their goals. (Notice the bottom goal on the list.)
It gives an interesting perspective. If someone back then had suggested that we would be discussing this subject today and in the position, we’re in, it would not only have been considered unbelievable, it truly would have been beyond the ability of the average person to imagine it’.
1. Amend all federal Civil Rights Acts, other legislation and government controls to prohibit discrimination in employment, housing, public accommodations and public services.
2. Issuance by the President of an executive order prohibiting the military from excluding for reasons of their sexual orientation, persons who of their own volition desire entrance into the Armed Services; and from issuing less-than-fully-honorable discharges from homosexuality; and the upgrading to fully honorable all such discharges previously issued, with retroactive benefits.
3. Issuance by the President of an executive order prohibiting discrimination in the federal civil service because of sexual orientation, in hiring and promoting; and prohibiting discriminations against homosexuals in security clearances.
4. Elimination of tax inequities victimizing single persons and same-sex couples.
5. Elimination of bars to the entry, immigration and naturalization of homosexual aliens.
6. Federal encouragement and support for sex education courses, prepared and taught by Gay women and men, presenting homosexuality as a valid, healthy preference and lifestyle as a viable alternative to heterosexuality.
7. Appropriate executive orders, regulations and legislation banning the compiling, maintenance and dissemination of information on an individual’s sexual preferences, behavior, and social and political activities for dossiers and data banks.
8. Federal funding of aid programs of Gay men’s and women’s organizations designed to alleviate the problems encountered by Gay women and men which are engendered by an oppressive sexist society.
9. Immediate release of all Gay women and men now incarcerated in detention centers, prisons and mental institutions because of sexual offense charges relating to victimless crimes or sexual orientation; and that adequate compensation be made for the physical and mental duress encountered; and that all existing records relating to the incarceration be immediately expunged.
1. All federal legislation and programs enumerated in Demands 1, 6, 7, 8 and 9 above should be implemented at the State level where applicable.
2. Repeal of all state laws prohibiting private sexual acts involving consenting persons; equalization for homosexuals and heterosexuals for the enforcement of all laws.
3. Repeal all state laws prohibiting solicitation for private voluntary sexual liaisons; and laws prohibiting prostitution, both male and female.
4. Enactment of legislation prohibiting insurance companies and other state-regulated enterprises from discriminating because of sexual orientation, in insurance and in bonding or any other prerequisite to employment or control of one’s personal demesne.
5. Enactment of legislation so that child custody, adoption, visitation rights, foster parenting, and the like shall not be denied because of sexual orientation or marital status.
6. Repeal of all laws prohibiting transvestism and cross-dressing.
*7. Repeal of all laws governing the age of sexual consent.
8. Repeal of all legislative provisions that restrict the sex or number of persons entering into a marriage unit; and the extension of legal benefits to all persons who cohabit regardless of sex or numbers.
“The greatest single victory of the gay movement over the past decade has been to shift the debate from behavior to identity, thus forcing opponents into a position where they can be seen as attacking the civil rights of homosexual citizens.” From “The Homosexualization of America”, by Homosexual activist, Dennis Altman
Now, that I have shown you demands that are contained within “The 1972 Gay Rights Platform”, is your allegiance dedicated to the demands contained within this platform?
“The Homosexual Agenda”
To people of the LGBTQIA organizations and those who either support the LGBTQIA community and organizations and or are Homosexuals themselves, have you heard of “The 1993 Gay Rights March on Washington, D.C.” and have you read their demands they made at that demonstration? Do you agree with the demands contained in “The 1993 Gay Rights March on Washington, D.C.”? And, if so, you need to fully commit to doing so. If you do not agree with them, are you going to take a stand against them fully, vociferously, in words and deeds? Here is a list of their demands:
”The 1993 Gay Rights March on Washington, D.C.”
These are the demands that were demanded at ”The 1993 Gay Rights March on Washington, D.C.” and their intentions are to make Pedophilia legal. Here is a list of their demands. Do you agree with the demands contained in “The 1993 Gay Rights on Washington, D.C.”? And, if so, you need to fully commit to doing so. If you do not agree with them, are you going to take a stand against them fully, vociferously, in words and deeds? Here is a list of their demands:
Demand #1 out of 7 of the 1993 Homosexual Agenda March wants to make Pedophilia legal!!! This predatory nature is one and the same. This is Caucasian Cultural behavior.
-Repeals all sodomy laws and legalizes all forms of sexual expression.
– Changes age of consent laws to allow sex with youth
-Repeals dress code laws
-Diverts defensive budget funds to cover AIDS patients medical expenses.
– Requires taxpayers funding of sex change operations.
– Requires taxpayers funding of IV needles to drug addicts
Demand # 3
-Legalizes same-sex marriages
– legalizes adoption, custody, and foster care within these structures.
– Requires inclusions of lesbians, gays, bisexuals, and transgenders in education and childcare.
Demand # 5
– Requires contraceptives and abortion services be made available to all ages.
Demand # 6
-Provides taxpayer funding for artificial insemination of lesbians and bisexuals
– Forbids religious-based concerns regarding homosexuality from being expressed.
Demand # 7
– Requires organizations such as the boy scouts to accept homosexual scoutmasters
Concerning homosexuals not being violent, they are more violent than heterosexuals.
“The survey found that same-sex cohabitants reported significantly more intimate partner violence than did opposite-sex cohabitants. Among women, 39.2 percent of the same-sex cohabitants and 21.7 percent of the opposite-sex cohabitants reported being raped, physically assaulted, and/or stalked by a marital/cohabiting partner at some time in their lifetime. Among men, the comparable figures are 23.1 percent and 7.4 percent. “
-Patricia Tjaden and Nancy Thoennes, “Extent, Nature, and Consequences of Intimate Partner Violence, DC: National Institute of Justice and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2000”, p.21.
Here is another article that supports the fact that sexual violence is far more prevalent than not among the LGBTQIA community.
“More Common Than Not: Sexual Violence Among LGBTQ Persons”
Now, that I have shown you the demands that are contained within “The1993 The Gay Rights March on Washington, D.C.”, is your allegiance dedicated to the demands contained within this platform?
For those who doubt this, just google “The 1972 Gay Rights Platform” and “The1993 The Gay Rights March on Washington, D.C.” and read both for yourself. You’ll see what their actual Agenda is for us and our children. The LGBTQIA Agenda is as I’ve stated it above.
Here is another issue that should be discussed. Why are the organized LGBTQIA organizations pushing so hard to normalize Transgenderism/Transsexualism? Such behavior is listed as a ‘gender identity disorder’ in sections 302.6 and 302.85 of ‘The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders’ (DSM-5) by The American Psychiatric Association. This behavior has been diagnosed as “GENDER DYSPHORIA”, by The American Psychiatric Association. To try and make such behavior normal when it isn’t, is tantamount to making the disease of cancer normal when it isn’t normal at all. So, what the organized LGBTQIA organizations and their ardent supporters really want for us and our children is for us and our children to be as sexually confused and as gender confused as possible.”
‘The terrible fraud of ‘transgender medicine’
Dr. Michelle Cretella on Transgenderism: A Mental Illness is Not a Civil Right
This is more of the Psychosis of being Transgendered.
“Trans Folks Want Babies Too”
“Full Documentary LGBTQ Gay Agenda”
“The Homosexual Agenda”
“The Gay Rights March on Washington”
My question is this: Why are LGBTQIA organizations and their supporters so hell-bent on teaching the acceptance of Homosexuality to our children? Does anyone here know what “Weaponized Subliminal Seduction” and “Propaganda” is and understand how it works on the human mind, especially a child’s mind? There are several books that clearly addresses what it is and how it works. Among those are these:
(1) “Tavistock Institute: Social Engineering The Masses” by Daniel Estulin
(2) “Propaganda” by Edward Bernays
(3) “Brainwashed” by Tom Burrell
(4) The Secret Sales Pitch” by August Bullock
This is being perpetrated in the public schools right now, as we speak. This was orchestrated by President Obama’s “Safe Schools Czar”, Kevin Jennings, who is the founder and former director of “The Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network” (GLSEN). If you doubt this click the links below and see for yourself.
Incorporate LGBT history, themes, and people into your curriculum!
- Ensure that your LGBT students see themselves reflected in your lessons.
- Create opportunities for all of your students to gain a more complex and authentic understanding of the world around them.
- Encourage respectful behavior, critical thinking, and social justice.
Some of the titles included on this website are:
As anyone who honestly examines the evidence can see, this push for acceptance and participation in Homosexuality is designed to convince our children that such behavior is natural and normal. It is also designed to curb our population. Of course, I know you doubt this too. However, all you need do is examine this evidence below, which proves this. And the fact that ‘Planned Parenthood’ has chosen a Lesbian, Dawn Laguens, current Executive Vice President and Chief Brand Officer, as its new face and Representative, further proves my point.
“Memorandum to Bernard Berelson (President, Population Council), found in the Archives Relevant to the Study of Population Policy for the US” 3/11/1969 by Frederick S. Jaffe, Vice President of Planned Parenthood–World Population.–
Just in case, you are still in doubt. Here is the actual chart below.
As evidenced here, even “Planned Parenthood” is a part of the ‘Homosexual Agenda’.
The Organized Homosexual/LGBTQIA organizations, under the auspices of ‘the Homosexual Agenda’, must stop trying to equate the plight of the LGBTQ community with the plight of Black people. ‘Gay is not the new Black’. So, the question must be asked when did we start defining ourselves based on our sexual behavior or by the manner in which we have sex with each other? Homosexuality is based on a person’s behavior. It is an action. You must participate in Homosexual behavior, to be considered a Homosexual. In other words, you must do it, in order to be it. Being Black is based on the color of one’s skin–melanin. The color of my skin is something I was born with. I was born Black and I cannot change the color of my skin, even if I wanted to, which I do not, by the way. However, one can stop participating in behavior such as Homosexuality any time that person so chooses to do so. They are not the same and can never be considered the same. Being Black is based on birth while being a Homosexual is based on choice. There is no evidence proving otherwise.
And the real Elephant in the room is sexual abuse of children and how it contributes to the Homosexualization of our children. The LGBTQIA organizations never discuss this issue. I wonder why? Why is one of the most important root causes of Homosexuality either completely ignored and not even discussed by Psychiatrists and other Psycho-Therapists, even though many of them know sexual abuse is at the root cause of Homosexuality?
Sexual Abuse: A Major Cause Of Homosexuality?
Yes, Childhood Sexual Abuse Often Does Contribute to Homosexuality
by Carla Clark, PhD | November 21, 2016
Child Sex Trafficking through Child “Protection” Services Exposed – Kidnapping Children for Sex
The North American Man/Boy Love Association
MEET ‘WOMEN’S AUXILIARY
OF NAMBLA’ (Butterfly Kisses)
Website celebrates sex between adult women, young girls
Read more at https://mobile.wnd.com/2002/07/14612/#PFu7k3TZQRuarM2x.99
Predators In Our Midst – Full Lecture on Child Sexual Abuse (Edited for YouTube)
Also, despite the LGBTQIA organizational best efforts to prove otherwise, there has been no scientific evidence proving that anyone is born ‘Gay’. After countless scientific studies, there is absolutely no evidence to prove anyone is born a Homosexual. See the Research studies below conducted by both Johns Hopkins University and Hampden-Sydney College for solid evidence proving my assertion.
Johns Hopkins Psychiatrist: ‘There Is No Gay Gene’
Michael W. Chapman By Michael W. Chapman | July 21, 2016 | 12:11 PM EDT
Dr. Paul R. McHugh.
“Sexuality and Gender”-
“Genetically Based: The Search for the Gay Gene”
H-SC Journal of Sciences (2014), Vol. III Ferrante
Genetically Based: The Search for the Gay Gene
Christopher M. Ferrante ‘15
Department of Biology, Hampden-Sydney College, Hampden-Sydney, VA 23943
“Scientific Research study of the effects of Atrazine on Amphibians”
“Despite the wealth of data from larvae and newly metamorphosed amphibians, the ultimate impacts of atrazine’s developmental effects on reproductive function and fitness at sexual maturity, which relate more closely to population level effects and amphibian declines, have been unexplored”.
There are those claiming this study proves they can turn someone into a Homosexual based on the chemical compound Atrazine. However, the problem with this study is the fact that there has been no actual research done on human beings and the long-term effects of Atrazine on human anatomical biology. The research in drawing such a conclusion would need actual human test subjects where large amounts of Atrazine were discovered in the DNA of children. Follow them throughout their childhood years, into Adulthood and see if Atrazine changed their anatomical biology from Male to Female or if these children become Homosexuals as Adults. So far, such research using human test subjects has not been done.
If they could change human anatomy to the degree some think they can, why are they spending so much time trying to use ‘Weaponized Subliminal Seduction’ and ‘Propaganda’ to convince our children such behavior is natural and normal?
And why hasn’t anyone discussed the Negative health effects of Homosexuality?
Here is some of the evidence that Homosexuals need to really consider, in terms of how such behavior negatively impacts their health.
“The Negative Health Effects of Homosexuality”
By Timothy J. Dailey, Ph. D. Senior Fellow, Center for Marriage and Family Studies
Homosexual activists attempt to portray their lifestyle as normal and healthy and insist that homosexual relationships are the equivalent in every way to their heterosexual counterparts. Hollywood and the media relentlessly propagate the image of the fit, healthy, and well-adjusted homosexual. The reality is quite opposite to this caricature which was recently conceded by the homosexual newspaper New York Blade News:
Reports at a national conference about sexually transmitted diseases indicate that gay men are in the highest risk group for several of the most serious diseases. . . . Scientists believe that the increased number of sexually tranmitted diseases (STD) cases is the result of an increase in risky sexual practices by a growing number of gay men who believe HIV is no longer a life-threatening illness.
Instability and promiscuity typically characterize homosexual relationships. These two factors increase the incidence of serious and incurable STDs. In addition, some homosexual behaviors put practitioners at higher risk for a variety of ailments, as cataloged by the following research data:
Risky Sexual Behavior on the Rise Among Homosexuals. Despite two decades of intensive efforts to educate homosexuals against the dangers of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and other STDs, the incidence of unsafe sexual practices that often result in various diseases is on the rise.
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), from 1994 to 1997 the proportion of homosexuals reporting having had anal sex increased from 57.6 percent to 61.2 percent, while the percentage of those reporting “always” using condoms declined from 69.6 percent to 60 percent.
The CDC reported that during the same period the proportion of men reporting having multiple sex partners and unprotected anal sex increased from 23.6 percent to 33.3 percent. The largest increase in this category (from 22 percent to 33.3 percent) was reported by homosexuals twenty-five years old or younger.
Homosexuals Failing to Disclose Their HIV Status to Sex Partners
A study presented July 13, 2000, at the XIII International Aids Conference in Durban, South Africa disclosed that a significant number of homosexual and bisexual men with HIV “continue to engage in unprotected sex with people who have no idea they could be contracting HIV.” Researchers from the University of California, San Francisco found that thirty-six percent of homosexuals engaging in unprotected oral, anal, or vaginal sex failed to disclose that they were HIV positive to casual sex partners.
A CDC report revealed that, in 1997, 45 percent of homosexuals reporting having had unprotected anal intercourse during the previous six months did not know the HIV serostatus of all their sex partners. Even more alarming, among those who reported having had unprotected anal intercourse and multiple partners, 68 percent did not know the HIV serostatus of their partners.
Young Homosexuals are at Increased Risk. Following in the footsteps of the generation of homosexuals decimated by AIDS, younger homosexuals are engaging in dangerous sexual practices at an alarming rate.
A Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health study of three-hundred-sixty-one young men who have sex with men (MSM) aged fifteen to twenty-two found that around 40 percent of participants reported having had anal-insertive sex, and around 30 percent said they had had anal-receptive sex. Thirty-seven percent said they had not used a condom for anal sex during their last same-sex encounter. Twenty-one percent of the respondents reported using drugs or alcohol during their last same-sex encounter.
A five-year CDC study of 3,492 homosexual males aged fifteen to twenty-two found that one-quarter had unprotected sex with both men and women. Another CDC study of 1,942 homosexual and bisexual men with HIV found that 19 percent had at least one episode of unprotected anal sex–the riskiest sexual behavior–in 1998 and 1997, a 50 percent increase from the previous two years.
Homosexual Promiscuity. Studies indicate that the average male homosexual has hundreds of sex partners in his lifetime:
A.P. Bell and M.S. Weinberg, in their classic study of male and female homosexuality, found that 43 percent of white male homosexuals had sex with 500 or more partners, with 28 percent having 1,000 or more sex partners.
In their study of the sexual profiles of 2,583 older homosexuals published in Journal of Sex Research, Paul Van de Ven et al. found that only 2.7 percent claimed to have had sex with one partner only. The most common response, given by 21.6 percent of the respondents, was of having a hundred-one to five hundred lifetime sex partners.
A survey conducted by the homosexual magazine Genre found that 24 percent of the respondents said they had had more than a hundred sexual partners in their lifetime. The magazine noted that several respondents suggested including a category of those who had more than a thousand sexual partners.
In his study of male homosexuality in Western Sexuality: Practice and Precept in Past and Present Times, M. Pollak found that “few homosexual relationships last longer than two years, with many men reporting hundreds of lifetime partners.” 
Promiscuity among Homosexual Couples. Even in those homosexual relationships in which the partners consider themselves to be in a committed relationship, the meaning of “committed” typically means something radically different from marriage.
In The Male Couple, authors David P. McWhirter and Andrew M. Mattison reported that in a study of hundred-fifty-six males in homosexual relationships lasting from one to thirty-seven years,
Only seven couples have a totally exclusive sexual relationship, and these men all have been together for less than five years. Stated another way, all couples with a relationship lasting more than five years have incorporated some provision for outside sexual activity in their relationships.
In Male and Female Homosexuality, M. Saghir and E. Robins found that the average male homosexual live-in relationship lasts between two and three years.
Unhealthy Aspects of “Monogamous” Homosexual Relationships. Even those homosexual relationships that are loosely termed “monogamous” do not necessarily result in healthier behavior.
The journal AIDS reported that men involved in relationships engaged in anal intercourse and oral-anal intercourse with greater frequency than those without a steady partner. Anal intercourse has been linked to a host of bacterial and parasitical sexually transmitted diseases, including AIDS.
The exclusivity of the relationship did not diminish the incidence of unhealthy sexual acts, which are commonplace among homosexuals. An English study published in the same issue of the journal AIDS concurred, finding that most “unsafe” sex acts among homosexuals occur in steady relationships.
Human Papillomavirus (HPV). HPV is a collection of more than seventy types of viruses that can cause warts, or papillomas, on various parts of the body. More than twenty types of HPV are incurable STDs that can infect the genital tract of both men and women. Most HPV infections are subclinical or asymptomatic, with only one in a hundred people experiencing genital warts.
HPV is “almost universal” among homosexuals. According to the homosexual newspaper The Washington Blade: “A San Francisco study of Gay and bisexual men revealed that HPV infection was almost universal among HIV-positive men and that 60 percent of HIV-negative men carried HPV.” 
HPV can lead to anal cancer. At the recent Fourth International AIDS Malignancy Conference at the National Institutes of Health, Dr. Andrew Grulich announced that “most instances of anal cancer are caused by a cancer-causing strain of HPV through receptive anal intercourse. HPV infects over 90 percent of HIV-positive gay men and 65 percent of HIV-negative gay men, according to a number of recent studies.”
The link between HPV and cervical cancer. Citing a presentation by Dr. Stephen Goldstone to the International Congress on Papillomavirus in Human Pathology in Paris, the Washington Blade reports that “HPV is believed to cause cervical cancer in women.” 
Hepatitis: A potentially fatal liver disease that increases the risk of liver cancer.
Hepatitis A: The Mortality and Morbidity Weekly Report published by the CDC reports: “Outbreaks of hepatitis A among men who have sex with men are a recurring problem in many large cities in the industrialized world.” 
Hepatitis B: This is a serious disease caused by a virus that attacks the liver. The virus, which is called hepatitis B virus (HBV), can cause lifelong infection, cirrhosis (scarring) of the liver, liver cancer, liver failure, and death. Each year in the United States, more than 200,000 people of all ages contract hepatitis B and close to 5,000 die of sickness caused by AIDS. The CDC reports that MSM are at increased risk for hepatitis B.
Hepatitis C is an inflammation of the liver that can cause cirrhosis, liver failure and liver cancer. The virus can lie dormant in the body for up to thirty years before flaring up. Although less so than with hepatitis A and B, MSM who engage in unsafe sexual practices remain at increased risk for contracting hepatitis C.
Gonorrhea: An inflammatory disease of the genital tract. Gonorrhea traditionally occurs on the genitals, but has recently appeared in the rectal region and in the throat. Although easily treated by antibiotics, according to the CDC only “about 50 percent of men have some signs or symptoms, and “many women who are infected have no symptoms of infection.”  Untreated gonorrhea can have serious and permanent health consequences, including infertility damage to the prostate and urethra.
A CDC report documents “significant increases during 1994 to 1997 in rectal gonorrhea . . . among MSM,” indicating that “safe sex” practices may not be taken as seriously as the aids epidemic begins to slow. In 1999 the CDC released data showing that male rectal gonorrhea is increasing among homosexuals amidst an overall decline in national gonorrhea rates. The report attributed the increase to a larger percentage of homosexuals engaging in unsafe sexual behavior.
The incidence of throat Gonorrhea is strongly associated with homosexual behavior. The Canadian Medical Association Journal found that “gonorrhea was associated with urethral discharge . . . and homosexuality (3.7 times higher than the rate among heterosexuals).”  Similarly, a study in the Journal of Clinical Pathology found that homosexual men had a much higher prevalence of pharyngeal (throat) gonorrhea–15.2 percent compared with 4.1 percent for heterosexual men.
Syphilis: A venereal disease that, if left untreated, can spread throughout the body over time, causing serious heart abnormalities, mental disorders, blindness, and death. The initial symptoms of syphilis are often mild and painless, leading some individuals to avoid seeking treatment. According to the National Institutes of Health, the disease may be mistaken for other common illnesses: “syphilis has sometimes been called ‘the great imitator’ because its early symptoms are similar to those of many other diseases.” Early symptoms include rashes, moist warts in the groin area, slimy white patches in the mouth, or pus-filled bumps resembling chicken pox.
According to the CDC, “transmission of the organism occurs during vaginal, anal, or oral sex.”  In addition, the Archives of Internal Medicine found that homosexuals acquired syphilis at a rate ten times that of heterosexuals.
The CDC reports that those who contract syphilis face potentially deadly health consequences: “It is now known that the genital sores caused by syphilis in adults also make it easier to transmit and acquire HIV infection sexually. There is a two to fivefold increased risk of acquiring HIV infection when syphilis is present.” 
Gay Bowel Syndrome (GBS): The Journal of the American Medical Association refers to GBS problems such as proctitis, proctocolitis, and enteritis as “sexually transmitted gastrointestinal syndromes.” Many of the bacterial and protozoa pathogens that cause GBS are found in feces and transmitted to the digestive system: According to the pro-homosexual text Anal Pleasure and Health, “[s]exual activities provide many opportunities for tiny amounts of contaminated feces to find their way into the mouth of a sexual partner . . . The most direct route is oral-anal contact.”
Proctitis and Proctocolitis are inflammations of the rectum and colon that cause pain, bloody rectal discharge and rectal spasms. Proctitis is associated with STDs such as gonorrhea, chlamydia, herpes, and syphilis that are widespread among homosexuals. The Sexually Transmitted Disease Information Center of the Journal of the American Medical Association reports that “[p]roctitis occurs predominantly among persons who participate in anal intercourse.”
Enteritis is inflammation of the small intestine. According to the Sexually Transmitted Disease Information Center of the Journal of the American Medical Association, “enteritis occurs among those whose sexual practices include oral-fecal contact.” Enteritis can cause abdominal pain, severe cramping, intense diarrhea, fever, malabsorption of nutrients, weight loss. According to a report in The Health Implications of Homosexuality by the Medical Institute for Sexual Health, some pathogens associated with enteritis and proctocolitis [see below] “appear only to be sexually transmitted among men who have sex with men.” 
HIV/AIDS Among Homosexuals. The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is responsible for causing AIDS, for which there exists no cure.
Homosexual men are the largest risk category. The CDC reports that homosexuals comprise the single largest exposure category of the more than 600,000 males with AIDS in the United States. As of December 1999, “men who have sex with men” and “men who have sex with men and inject drugs” together accounted for 64 percent of the cumulative total of male AIDS cases.
Women risk contracting HIV/AIDS through sexual relations with infected MSM. According to the CDC, “HIV infection among U.S. women has increased significantly over the last decade, especially in communities of color. CDC estimates that, in the United States, between 120,000 and 160,000 adult and adolescent females are living with HIV infection, including those with AIDS.” In 1999, for example, most of the women (40 percent) reported with AIDS were infected through heterosexual exposure to HIV. That number is actually higher, as “historically, more than two-thirds of AIDS cases among women initially reported without identified risk were later reclassified as heterosexual transmission.”
Homosexuals with HIV are at increased risk for developing other life-threatening diseases. A paper delivered at the Fourth International AIDS Malignancy Conference at the National Institutes of Health reported that homosexual men with HIV have “a 37-fold increase in anal cancer, a 4-fold increase in Hodgkin’s disease (cancer of the lymph nodes), a 2.7-fold increase in cancer of the testicles, and a 2.5 fold increase in lip cancer.”
HIV/AIDS Among Young People
AIDS incidence is on the rise among teens and young adults. The CDC reports that “even though AIDS incidence (the number of new cases diagnosed during a given time period, usually a year) is declining, there has not been a comparable decline in the number of newly diagnosed HIV cases among youth.”
Young homosexual men are at particular risk. The CDC estimates that “at least half of all new HIV infections in the United States are among people under twenty-five, and the majority of young people are infected sexually.”  By the end of 1999, 29,629 young people aged thirteen to twenty-four were diagnosed with AIDS in the United States. MSM was the single largest risk category: in 1999, for example, 50 percent of all new AIDS cases were reported among young homosexuals.
Sexually active young women are also at risk. The CDC reports: “In 1999, among young women the same age, 47 percent of all AIDS cases reported were acquired heterosexually and 11 percent were acquired through injection drug use.”
Homosexuals with STDs Are at an Increased Risk for HIV Infection. Studies of MSM treated in STD clinics show rates of infection as high as 36 percent in major cities. A CDC study attributed the high infection rate to having high numbers of anonymous sex partners: “[S]yphilis, gonorrhea, and chlamydia apparently have been introduced into a population of MSM who have large numbers of anonymous partners, which can result in rapid and extensive transmission of STDs.“ The CDC report concluded: “Persons with STDs, including genital ulcer disease and nonulcerative STD, have a twofold to fivefold increased risk for HIV infection.”
Anal Cancer: Homosexuals are at increased risk for this rare type of cancer, which is potentially fatal if the anal-rectal tumors metastasize to other bodily organs.
Dr. Joel Palefsky, a leading expert in the field of anal cancer, reports that while the incidence of anal cancer in the United States is only 0.9/100,000, that number soars to 35/100,000 for homosexuals. That rate doubles again for those who are HIV positive, which, according to Dr. Palefsky, is “roughly ten times higher than the current rate of cervical cancer.”
At the Fourth International AIDS Malignancy Conference at the National Institutes of Health in May 2000, Dr. Andrew Grulich announced that the incidence of anal cancer among homosexuals with HIV “was raised 37-fold compared with the general population.” 
Lesbians are at Risk through Sex with MSM
Many Lesbians also have had sex with men. The homosexual newspaper The Washington Blade, citing a 1998 study in the Journal of Infectious Diseases, reported that “the study’s data confirmed previous scientific observations that most women who have sex with women also have had sex with men.“ The study added that “sex with men in the prior year was common, as were sexual practices between female partners that possibly could transmit HPV.”
Lesbians have more male sex partners than their heterosexual counterparts. A study of sexually transmitted disease among lesbians reviewed in The Washington Blade notes: “Behavioral research also demonstrates that a woman’s sexual identity is not an accurate predictor of behavior, with a large proportion of ‘lesbian’ women reporting sex with (often high risk) men.” The study found that “the median number of lifetime male sexual partners was significantly greater for WSW (women who have sex with women) than controls (twelve partners versus six). WSW were significantly more likely to report more than fifty-lifetime male sexual partners.” 
A study in the American Journal of Public Health concurs that bisexual women are at increased risk for contracting sexually transmitted diseases: “Our findings corroborate the finding that wsmw (women who have sex with men and women) are more likely than WSMO (women who have sex with men only) to engage in various high-risk behaviors” and also “to engage in a greater number of risk-related behaviors.” The study suggested that the willingness to engage in risky sexual practices “could be tied to a pattern of sensation-seeking behavior.” 
MSM spread HIV to women. A five-year study by the CDC of 3,492 homosexuals aged fifteen to twenty-two found that one in six also had sex with women. Of those having sex with women, one-quarter “said they recently had unprotected sex with both men and women.” Nearly 7 percent of the men in the study were HIV positive.” “The study confirms that young bisexual men are a ‘bridge’ for HIV transmission to women,” said the CDC.
“Exclusive” Lesbian Relationships Also at Risk. The assumption that lesbians involved in exclusive sexual relationships are at reduced risk for sexual disease is false. The journal Sexually Transmitted Infections concludes: “The risk behavior profile of exclusive WSW was similar to all WSW.” One reason for this is because lesbians “were significantly more likely to report past sexual contact with a homosexual or bisexual man and sexual contact with an IDU (intravenous drug user).” 
Cancer Risk Factors for Lesbians. Citing a 1999 report released by the Institute of Medicine, an arm of the National Academy of Sciences, the homosexual newspaper The Washington Blade notes that “various studies on Lesbian health suggest that certain cancer risk factors occur with greater frequency in this population. These factors include higher rates of smoking, alcohol use, poor diet, and being overweight.”  Elsewhere the Blade also reports: “Some experts believe Lesbians might be more likely than women, in general, to develop breast or cervical cancer because a disproportionate number of them fall into high-risk categories.” 
What should be obvious here is the fact that participating in such behavior is extremely dangerous to one’s own health.
For more evidence of “The Negative Health Effects of Homosexuality” and the negative risk factors of such behavior go to this website:
There are also many within the organized Homosexual /LGBTQIA organizations who are now postulating the theory that Homosexuality has always been a part of indigenous Afrikan Culture. However, there is absolutely no evidence, i.e. Archaeological, Anthropological, Linguistic, Etymological evidence, that Homosexuality has ever been an acceptable form of indigenous Afrikan Cultural behavior between hue-man beings, by the overwhelming majority of Afrikan people, before foreign contact, or even now. It is not an acceptable part of indigenous Afrikan Culture anywhere. It is a completely Euro-Asiatic construct. You won’t find anything supporting this practice nor the acceptance of it, written, carved, painted on any Temple walls, Tombs, or papyri, in any indigenous Afrikan language, etc., either in the ancient Nile Valley Afrikan Civilizations of Kemet/Ta-Merry/Ta-Wii (Egypt), Ta-Seti/Nubia (The Sudan), Ta-Nehisi/Kush (Ethiopia), or in the Medieval Civilizations of Ghana, Mali, or Songhay, or in the Ancient Civilizations of Monomotapa/The Great Zimbabwe, or in any other indigenous Afrikan Civilization on the continent of Afrika, extolling the virtues of Homosexuality, or the acceptance of Homosexuality. And last I checked, we’re still an Afrikan people. This, despite our more than 400–year sojourn here in the Western Hemisphere. As a race of people, we’ve been continually subjected to Spiritual, Ideological, Philosophical, Psychological, and Cultural Terrorism by Caucasians for over 400 years or more. This Spiritual, Ideological, Philosophical, Psychological, and Cultural Terrorism has been continually perpetrated against us, as a race of people by Caucasians since 1619 A.D. and onward. To bolster my argument, I am presenting what some of our most esteemed Afrikan-Centered Scholars had to say on the topic of Homosexuality and why such behavior is not a part of indigenous Afrikan Culture. Here is what each of them had this to say on this topic of Homosexuality:
“Just recently the cause of Blacks was linked with the cause of gays. The ships brought no gays. They brought men with manhood, and women with their womanhood, and men who knew what to do with their manhood with no confusion. When Nature, or God, or whoever you want to call it designed man and woman, he purposefully designed them to go together. He did not design man to romance man. By design, here’s not only a perfect fit with the lady, it is a glorious fit. It is something that should be approached with a certain degree of sacredness in its own time and place. This is why you cannot compare the Afrikan attitude with the European attitude; they are coming from different cultural points of view. The European living in varying climates and the Arab living in the sand made different uses of the female and developed a different attitude towards the female. Taken out of the African environment, you may develop the same traits and habits as the European without knowing that many of these traits are about as un-African as they can be.”–Dr. John Henrik Clarke
And here is a quote by one of our most esteemed Afrikan-Centered Psychiatrists. She had this to say about Homosexuality:
The statement below is just as true today as it was when she initially said it in 1974….
“The intent of racist programming had been achieved: ‘Give up trying to be a Black man. Why not be a woman?’ Many Black males have answered unconsciously, ‘Why not!’ The braided and curled hair, the earrings and bracelets, the midriff tops, the cinch-waisted pants, the flowered underwear, the high-heeled shoes with platforms and the pocketbooks are all behavioral answers to the above. They say, in loud and clear language, ‘White man I will never come after you. I cannot run in my high heels- you know that. And I may mess up my hair.’ The white run clothing industry is all too pleased to provide the costumes of feminine disguise for Black Male escape”. –“The Isis Papers”, Chapter 6: ‘The Politics Behind Black Male Passivity, Effeminization, Bisexuality and Homosexuality’ (August 1974). ~ Dr. Frances Cress Welsing
And for those who claim that Niankhkhnum and his twin brother, Khnumhotep were both Homosexual, you must provide concrete evidence, not conjecture and assumptions. The article below more than proves that is what those who make such a claim are doing is nothing more than conjecture and assumptions. Below is the actual un-doctored photo of them.
“The wall on the left-hand side of the doorway (east) shows Khnumhotep with his wife, Khenut, who was ‘Prophetess of Hathor, Mistress of the Sycamore’. On the right (west) Niankhkhnum is seen with his wife Khentkaus, of the same title. On the south wall, we also find a depiction of the deceased standing with their sons.”
And to those who wish to present the Papyrus entitled “The Contendings of Set and Heru”, to support their contention that Homosexuality was a way of life in ancient Kemet (Egypt), the question I ask is ‘what is the moral of the story’, in this Papyrus? This is a critical question relative to this particular Papyrus that you must ask yourselves. Because at the end of the day, the critical question that must be asked and answered is this: Was Homosexuality ever an acceptable part of their Culture and spiritual system? If you research “The 42 Principles of Ma’at”, the evidence of what the ancient Kemetu (Egyptians) really practiced will prove conclusively that Homosexuality was never an acceptable part of their Culture or Spiritual system.
For more evidence see the lecture by Dr. Marimba Ani: “Is Homosexuality Destructive For The Black Family”
The youtube link is provided in the sources, at the end of this work.
Here is a quote below I want everyone reading this article to consider and compare it to the two quotes by Afrikan-Centered Scholars and the youtube clip above. This is what one of the most well known Greek philosophers had to say about Homosexuality/Pederasty.
He said, “It is assumed without argument that pederasty alone can satisfy a man’s highest and noblest aspirations. And the love between a man and a woman, when spoken of at all, is altogether inferior; a purely physical impulse whose sole object is procreation”. –Plato, “The Symposium”
Now, I challenge anyone who disagrees with me, to present some factual evidence that is written similar to what Plato said and wrote, in any of our indigenous Afrikan languages or even in Arabic, in ancient or medieval Afrika, before foreign contact, proving indigenous Afrikan people have ever accepted and supported then or now, the acceptance of such behavior as being natural and normal indigenous Afrikan Cultural behavior. And present some actual scientific evidence that refutes all that I’ve asserted.
Those who are pushing the idea that Homosexuality has always been a part of indigenous Afrikan Culture when it isn’t, are either confused, or disingenuous, or both. But, so has murder and rape existed since the beginning of human existence too. However, the real issue is this: Those who push the idea that Homosexuality is natural and normal either:
(1) They don’t know what the correct definition of Culture and what it actually is
(2) They know the correct definition of what Culture actually is and are trying to ‘Bamboozle’ our people into believing it is something it isn’t.
The fact that one might find an example of Homosexuality in Ancient Afrika doesn’t make it an acceptable part of indigenous Afrikan Culture. If one looks hard enough one can find exceptions to almost anything, almost anywhere. What you have perhaps found are nothing more than exceptions to the rule. Exceptions to the rule can never be the rule, in and of itself.
I’ll leave you with this thought to contemplate. If you don’t know and understand Culture; what it is and how it works, everything else you think you understand will only confuse you. Culture is defined as a set of ideas, beliefs, concepts, and practices, etc., that are adhered to by a collective group of people, usually along racial and ethnic lines. It manifests itself in all areas of people activity. And keep in mind, Culture is practiced as a group, collectively. Culture is not an individual endeavor or practice. As two examples of Ethnic groups (Tribes) in Ghana, there are the Akan and the Ashanti. Neither of whom practices Homosexuality as a part of their Culture. And there are plenty of other examples other examples of various Ethnic groups in Afrika, such as the Ewe, Afar, Tuareg, Yoruba, Igbo, Fulani, Mandinka, Hausa, Mande, Wolof, Kikuyu, Somali, Hutu, Sotho, Zulu, Tsonga, Chewa, Twa, Masai, just to name a few more examples of whole Ethnic groups (Tribes) in Afrika; none of whom, who practice, nor accepts Homosexuality as being natural or normal behavior or accepts such behavior as a part of their Culture. The article below further confirms the fact Homosexuality is not an acceptable part of indigenous Afrikan Culture.
“Akwaaba! (Welcome!), says Ghana — but not if you’re gay”
By Yaw Amanfoh, a Ghanaian-American, queer-identifying, gay man who recently graduated from the University of North Carolina at Asheville with a bachelor’s degree in mathematics
This article is even more evidence proving Homosexuality is not accepted in Afrika, in this case, Ghana. There is even a sign posted in the Airport in Accra, Ghana warning of not bringing such behavior into Ghana.
So, to clear up any confusion here is the correct definition of Culture.
A set of ideas, concepts, beliefs, behavior, language, and practices agreed on and adhered to by a large group of people, usually along racial and ethnic lines. It is collective in scope and practice. It is ideology, philosophy, spirituality, language, the arts, and other manifestations of human intellectual achievement regarded collectively, etc. synonyms: the arts, the humanities, intellectual achievement, literature, music, painting, philosophy, the performing arts, etc.
So, in conclusion, what we, who oppose Homosexuality are saying is this: Homosexuality/Pederasty/Pedophilia/Pan-Sexuality/Transgenderism, Transsexualism, etc. and any other behaviors associated with the LGBTQIA organizations and the people who practice those behaviors are wrong—period. Now, if you doubt all that I’ve posted, read these the books below. And watch the videos I provided for further evidence and proof that substantiates all that I am asserting. The evidence I’ve provided will clear up any confusion you might have on this issue.
Finally, due to all of the documented evidence I’ve provided above, we, who are sane, and a part of ‘The Straight Black Pride’ movement, stand proud and we stand firmly against the acceptance of the LGBTQIA organizations, its supporters, and any and all people who practice and/or support such behavior, as is contained within their “1972 Gay Rights Platform” and in their demands made at “The 1993 Gay Rights March on Washington, D.C.”
Sources i.e. Books, Websites, Lectures on video, etc.
(1) “War on The Horizon: Black Resistance To The white-Sex Assault” by The Irritated Genie Of Soufeese and can be purchased at http://www.waronthehorizon.com/
(2) “Homosexuality And The Effeminization Of Afrikan Males” by Mwalimu K. Bomani Baruti and can be purchased at http://www.AkobenHouse.com/
(3) “Centered” by Mwalimu K. Bomani Baruti and can be purchased at http://www.AkobenHouse.com/
(4) “Yurugu” by Dr. Marimba Ani
(5) YouTube Interview with Mwalimu K. Bomani Baruti and The Irritated Genie of Soufeese
(6) Dr. John Henrik Clarke on Homosexuality
(7) Dr. Marimba Ani: Is Homosexuality Destructive For The Black Family
(8) Dr. Yosef Ben Jochannan speaks. Straight Black Pride
(9) Obituary of Alfred Freedman, prominent, psychiatrist, dies
Emma Brown, Washington Post
Published 4:00 am, Friday, April 22, 2011
(11) “Marcus Garvey Jr. on Homosexuality, Part #2”
(12) “The 1972 Gay Rights Platform”
(13) “The 1993 Gay Rights March on Washington, D.C.”
(14) “Full Documentary LGBTQ Gay Agenda”
(15) “The Homosexual Agenda”
(16) Dr. Michelle Cretella on Transgenderism: A Mental Illness is Not a Civil Right
(17) “The Isis Papers” by Dr. Frances Cress Welsing
(18) “The United Independent Compensatory Code/System/Concept”, by Neely Fuller
(19) “The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders” (DSM-5)
(20) Sexual Abuse: A Major Cause Of Homosexuality?
Yes, Childhood Sexual Abuse Often Does Contribute to Homosexuality
by Carla Clark, PhD | November 21, 2016
Child Sex Trafficking through Child “Protection” Services Exposed – Kidnapping Children for Sex
(21) Johns Hopkins Psychiatrist: ‘There Is No Gay Gene’
Michael W. Chapman By Michael W. Chapman | July 21, 2016, | 12:11 PM EDT
Dr. Paul R. McHugh.
(22) Johns Hopkins Psychiatrist: ‘There Is No Gay Gene’
“Sexuality and Gender”
(23) “Genetically Based: The Search for the Gay Gene”
H-SC Journal of Sciences (2014), Vol. III Ferrante
Genetically Based: The Search for the Gay Gene
Christopher M. Ferrante ‘15
Department of Biology, Hampden-Sydney College, Hampden-Sydney, VA 23943
(24) The Negative Health Effects of Homosexuality
(25) “More Common Than Not: Sexual Violence Among LGBTQ Persons”
(26) “LGBT-Inclusive Curriculum”
(27) The North American Man/Boy Love Association
(28) MEET ‘WOMEN’S AUXILIARY
OF NAMBLA’ (Butterfly Kisses)
Website celebrates sex between adult women, young girls
Read more at https://mobile.wnd.com/2002/07/14612/#PFu7k3TZQRuarM2x.99
(29) “Akwaaba! (Welcome!), says Ghana — but not if you’re gay”
(30) The Tomb of Niankhkhnum and Khnumhotep at Saqqara in Egypt
(31)”Scientific Research study of the effects of Atrazine on Amphibians”